The genetics of their psychology and personality are thus not well-guarded against mutation, and like a virus, they readily pick up pieces of Identity and stray strings of Meaning they find floating in the medium. The old pillars that provided strength and solidity to people - church and family being two of them, friends you actually know in the real world being another, engagement with thought longer and deeper than scrolling through twitter Hot Takes - are largely absent from many people. They do not have much by way of a core of fundamental being inside of them. It occurs to me that many, many people today lack a stable core. It's also the mechanism that allows them to suddenly become virulent and lethal. That's what makes them so incredibly changeable - so mutable.
TESIMONEY DNC SERVER WHAT DID THEY HAVE TO HIDE CODE
They also just grab up any stray genetic code in their vicinity and incorporate it into their genetic core. They lose chunks of their genetic code in replication. Their genetic code is not well-guarded against misreplication and error. This term is not accurate but it works for the analogy. Viruses have what I'll call an unstable core. One of the reasons why I have tried to avoid making the argument that we don't mask during flu season, so we should not be masking for COVID-19 given that vaccines are widely available, is precisely that I was always worried that at some point, somebody would respond, "Well, we should be masking during flu season!" It seems that moment has arrived. But of the five reasons he lists for continued masking and social distancing, two of them are "it's flu season" and "other viruses are out there." linked to a story from contributor Jay Bhatt, a doctor and public-health professor, arguing that people should resist returning to normal after receiving their vaccine booster. In addition to Walensky's suggestion that we should mask to protect even against the common cold, he notes an ABC "News" article by a doctor urging the same Forever Masking line. Philip Klein of the corporate neoliberal blog National Review has had enough of the Forever Masking push.Īnd we do seem to be in the early stages of a Pivot to Forever Masking, as he calls it. You are allowed to lie about covid so long as the lie supports the officially sanctioned state propaganda. Those numbers on mask effectiveness are from him (though of course they're widely available).Ĭompare her "80% reduction" claim to the claim I noted in the sidebar, highlighted by leftwing comic Jimmy Dore, by a doctor on NBC's Today show that covid has killed 146,000 children. The drug store masks that almost everyone actually uses reduce transmission by 10-12%, tops.Įven leftwing Covid Karen AllahPundit has finally found a covid-panic hill he isn't willing to die on. Where is she getting that fantastical, farcical, medical misinformation claim that masks reduce the spread of covid by 80%? Even the N95 masks that actually work only reduce transmission by 60%. Spoiler alert: Your winnings consist of a box of drug store masks. Those of you who said "they're addicted to the pandemic" or "they will never let the pandemic end," collect your winnings. Now That the Covid Pandemic Is Diminishing, Why Don't We Wear Masks Forever to Reduce Infection By the Flu and Even the Common Cold? CDC Head Rachel Walensky: Hey, I've Got a Great Idea.